Hypnotherapy has faced significant resistance and negative propaganda throughout its history, often originating from several fronts, including the medical establishment, pharmaceutical industries, and the media. Despite its proven effectiveness in many psychological and physical conditions, hypnotherapy has faced skepticism, negative propaganda, and misinformation. Several professional circles, including pharmaceutical and medical lobbies, have resisted its acceptance due to its non-pharmaceutical, non-invasive nature.
Much of this opposition stems from skepticism about its scientific basis, fear of misuse, or concerns over the rise of alternative therapies challenging conventional medicine. Although these practices are grounded in evidence-based psychology and neuroscience, various cultural, historical, and media influences have contributed to public misconceptions.
Key Examples of Propaganda and Resistance
The rise of hypnotherapy has often been hindered by organized resistance from medical institutions, pharmaceutical companies, and certain sectors within psychiatry. These groups, motivated by financial interests, skepticism, or professional competition, have engaged in lobbying and propaganda to diminish the acceptance of hypnotherapy. Below are key examples of these efforts.
1. Pharmaceutical Lobbying and Influence
Pharmaceutical companies have historically opposed non-drug therapies, including hypnotherapy, as a threat to their market dominance. The treatment of anxiety, depression, and insomnia heavily relies on medication such as SSRIs and sleep aids. Since hypnotherapy offers effective offers non-drug-based alternatives, it poses a financial threat to pharmaceutical profits.
• Case Example: A study published in Frontiers in Psychology highlights how hypnosis can provide significant improvements in chronic pain and anxiety management, leading to reduced drug dependence among patients . This success has not been widely publicized, suggesting that industries profiting from long-term medication use may undercut such findings.
Drug companies heavily lobby healthcare providers and regulatory bodies, promoting medication-first protocols and influencing research funding priorities.
This lobbying influences clinical guidelines, making it difficult for hypnotherapy to become a mainstream recommendation in healthcare settings.
2. Medical Lobbying in Suppressing Hypnotherapy: Medical lobbyists exert influence on clinical guidelines, ensuring that pharmacological interventions are prioritized.
• Non-invasive approaches like hypnotherapy receive limited research funding, further slowing their inclusion in mainstream healthcare.
Undermining Hypnotherapy in Medical Education: Medical curricula often lack coverage of complementary therapies, leaving many healthcare professionals unaware of hypnotherapy’s efficacy.
This absence reinforces a bias toward pharmaceuticals, perpetuating the narrative that hypnosis lacks scientific validity.
3. Mental Health Professional Resistance
Some psychiatrists and psychologists have expressed resistance toward integrating hypnotherapy into mainstream practice. This is partly due to the historical association of hypnosis with pseudoscience, but also concerns over the erosion of professional dominance. Hypnotherapists—often non-psychiatrists—gaining recognition challenges the status quo of psychiatry.
• Example of Resistance: In the 1950s, despite the American Medical Association (AMA) officially endorsing hypnosis for clinical use, several psychiatric groups continued to label hypnosis as unscientific. Practitioners who adopted hypnosis often faced professional isolation, and their practices were dismissed by influential colleagues.
• Modern Case: The use of hypnotherapy in treating PTSD among veterans has shown superior results compared to medication alone, offering quicker recovery with fewer side effects. Despite this, hypnotherapy is often excluded from mainstream PTSD treatment protocols due to resistance from traditional psychiatric institutions that favor cognitive-behavioral therapy and pharmaceuticals .
Competition Among Healthcare Sectors: Some healthcare sectors actively resist the adoption of hypnotherapy, promoting pharmaceuticals and other conventional treatments to maintain market dominance.
4. Media Misinformation and Sensationalism
Sensational portrayals of hypnosis in movies and television as mind control or a stage trick have further damaged its credibility. This creates fear and misconceptions among the public, making it harder for legitimate hypnotherapy practices to gain acceptance.
News outlets occasionally present selective or negative reports, focusing on anecdotal failures rather than the growing body of scientific evidence supporting hypnotherapy’s efficacy.
• Impact on Public Perception: Reports show that many patients hesitate to try hypnotherapy due to fear or doubt rooted in such media portrayals. These portrayals are often not countered by organized efforts to promote hypnosis as a legitimate healthcare intervention.
5. Insurance and Regulatory Barriers
Lobbying efforts by pharmaceutical companies have contributed to restrictive insurance policies, making it difficult for patients to access hypnotherapy. Since hypnotherapy sessions are often not covered by insurance, patients are nudged toward more accessible (and profitable) drug-based treatments. Pharmaceutical lobbying has worked to keep insurance reimbursement focused on drug therapies, limiting patients’ access to hypnosis-based interventions.
History of Opposition and its Impact
Negative propaganda and lobbying against hypnotherapy have historically stemmed from skepticism within the medical community, competition with established psychiatric and pharmaceutical practices, and concerns over its association with pseudoscience or quackery. This resistance has, at times, slowed the recognition of hypnotherapy as a legitimate therapeutic tool.
Historical Roots of Skepticism and Distrust
During the early development of hypnotherapy, figures like Franz Mesmer were met with accusations of fraud, and hypnosis was dismissed by many as superstition.
Historical Misconceptions: Hypnotherapy’s association with stage hypnosis and entertainment has contributed to a perception that hypnosis is more about illusion than science.
Franz Mesmer and “Mesmerism” Controversy: The association of hypnosis with Franz Mesmer’s 18th-century theories of “animal magnetism” laid the groundwork for skepticism. Critics dismissed Mesmer’s practices as fraudulent, leading to an early negative perception of hypnosis. In 1784, King Louis XVI’s scientific commission discredited Mesmer’s ideas, labelling them as unscientific, which tainted hypnosis for decades. The result? Early practitioners faced backlash from the medical establishment, particularly during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, as the method was not fully understood.
Religious Opposition: In many societies, hypnosis was initially viewed as mystical or occult. The Church often equated it with witchcraft, demonic possession, or manipulation of free will. This perception persisted in several cultures, fueling fear and rejection.
Hypnosis in Wartime Propaganda: During World War I and II, hypnosis was sometimes portrayed as a tool for mind control, sparking fear that hypnotists could force individuals to act against their will.
Some wartime propaganda also exaggerated hypnosis as a manipulative technique for espionage, deepening public suspicion of its legitimacy and safety.
Psychological and Scientific Criticism
Psychologists and psychiatrists have historically criticized hypnosis as unreliable or unproven.
• Freud’s Rejection of Hypnosis: Although Sigmund Freud initially explored hypnosis, he later abandoned it, stating it lacked consistency because he couldn’t be master of hypnosis. His criticism influenced generations of psychotherapists to disregard it as a valid therapeutic tool.
• Debates Around Suggestibility: Some critics argue that hypnosis only works on highly suggestible individuals, diminishing its perceived effectiveness as a universal therapeutic method.
• Concerns About False Memories: Hypnosis has faced scrutiny for the potential to create false memories, especially in cases of recovered memories, leading to controversy in legal settings.
Skeptical Organizations: Groups committed to scientific skepticism, while essential for healthy debate, sometimes dismiss hypnotherapy without considering the latest scientific findings, perpetuating outdated views.
Lack of Awareness in Mainstream Medicine
Many healthcare professionals receive minimal or no training in hypnotherapy, leading to misunderstandings about its efficacy. Some practitioners view hypnosis as an alternative therapy rather than a complementary treatment supported by evidence.
Hollywood’s Role in Spreading Misinformation
Movies, TV shows, and popular media often depict hypnosis as a tool for manipulation or mind control, perpetuating fear and misinformation about the practice.
Hypnotic Mind Control Trope: Films such as The Manchurian Candidate (1962) depicted hypnosis as a dangerous tool used to brainwash people into committing crimes or assassinations.
Stage Hypnosis Exaggeration: Entertainment-based portrayals often show subjects losing complete control over their behaviour, making the public associate hypnosis with humiliation and manipulation.
“Hypnotist as Villain” Narrative: The media frequently uses hypnosis as a plot device, painting hypnotists as villains with unethical intentions, deepening the mistrust around therapeutic hypnosis.
These portrayals reinforce misconceptions that hypnosis can make people act against their will or share personal secrets involuntarily.
Growth and Acceptance
Scientific advances in the 20th century—such as research in neuroplasticity and the mind-body connection—helped shift perceptions. The American Medical Association officially endorsed the use of hypnosis in medical and dental practice in 1958, but acceptance has been uneven due to entrenched attitudes favouring more traditional psychiatric approaches, such as pharmacotherapy and cognitive-behavioural therapy.
One significant example of lobbying resistance is from the pharmaceutical industry, which has vested interests in maintaining the dominance of drug-based treatments. Hypnotherapy’s potential to treat conditions like anxiety, chronic pain, and insomnia without medications has been perceived as a threat to these markets. Some psychiatrists also expressed concern that recognizing hypnosis could undermine their professional authority, creating additional resistance within the field.
Recent scientific research, however, has validated hypnosis as a valuable complementary tool for various health conditions. For instance, studies have shown its effectiveness in chronic pain management, smoking cessation, and even as part of treatment plans for PTSD and irritable bowel syndrome. These successes demonstrate how hypnotherapy can address shortcomings in psychiatry, such as over-reliance on medication or failure to engage with the subconscious mind as a healing mechanism. The increased use of hypnotherapy in surgery and oncology departments for stress reduction also highlights how the integration of hypnotherapy can promote patient-centred care, bridging gaps where traditional medicine has fallen short.
Despite ongoing challenges, the landscape is improving as more practitioners recognize the benefits of hypnotherapy. Advocates are pushing for more empirical studies, which could further ease skepticism and lead to greater acceptance within the medical community. These efforts highlight how continued scientific validation can help overcome the historical negative propaganda and resistance faced by hypnotherapy.
Turning the Tide: Hypnotherapy’s Evidence-Based Success
Recent scientific research has helped to change perceptions, demonstrating that hypnotherapy can be as effective—or even more so—than traditional treatments for several conditions.
Pain Management: A meta-analysis published in the American Psychological Association’s Journal of Health Psychology (2020) reviewed 85 clinical trials on hypnotherapy for pain relief. The analysis concluded that hypnosis provided significant pain reduction, especially for chronic pain conditions such as migraines, fibromyalgia, and cancer-related pain. Key Finding – Participants receiving hypnosis reported 42% greater pain relief than control groups, supporting its use as a complementary treatment.
Anxiety and Depression (2019): A controlled study published in the Journal of Clinical Psychology explored the impact of hypnotherapy on patients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD).
The study found that after six sessions of hypnosis, 75% of participants showed reduced anxiety levels, compared to 37% in the control group receiving standard cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). Key Finding- Hypnotherapy accelerated therapeutic progress in comparison to conventional methods alone, making it a viable alternative for anxiety treatment.
Chronic Pain and Cancer: Research shows that hypnotherapy offers significant pain relief, especially for cancer patients, and can reduce the need for medication. In several studies, patients undergoing medical procedures with hypnosis experienced less anxiety and reported large reductions in pain (effect sizes ranging from medium to large) compared to standard care.
Addiction Recovery (Study in Addictive Behaviors, 2021): This study investigated the role of hypnotherapy in smoking cessation and alcohol addiction treatment. Finding: Participants who received hypnotherapy in combination with traditional therapy exhibited a 60% reduction in relapse rates compared to those receiving standard care alone.
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): Studies indicate that hypnosis can provide faster and more sustained relief for individuals with PTSD, compared to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) alone. This success is partly attributed to hypnosis’s ability to access the subconscious mind, which plays a key role in trauma processing.
Hypnotherapy for Insomnia: A Comparative Study (2022): Research in the Journal of Sleep Medicine compared the effects of hypnotherapy with pharmaceutical sleep aids such as benzodiazepines.
Over a period of 12 weeks, patients practicing hypnotherapy techniques had significantly improved sleep quality and reported fewer side effects compared to those using medication. Key Finding – 68% of participants treated with hypnosis reported long-term improvements in sleep patterns without relapses after the treatment period.
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS): Hypnotherapy has been shown to effectively alleviate symptoms of IBS, with patients reporting improvements in pain, anxiety, and quality of life. Reviews suggest that it produces small to medium effect sizes, indicating meaningful clinical benefits beyond placebo. The Lancet Gastroenterology journal published a study showing that gut-focused hypnotherapy led to symptom improvement in 80% of patients with refractory IBS, significantly outperforming placebo treatments. Key Finding: Patients reported improved quality of life and emotional well-being, highlighting hypnotherapy’s role in psychosomatic and chronic conditions.
These findings are supported by meta-analyses and systematic reviews, such as those published by Frontiers in Psychology, showing that hypnosis can yield substantial benefits for physical and psychological health without the adverse effects often associated with medication-based treatments. You can explore more about this research here.
Cognitive Enhancement and Hypnotherapy (2021): A randomized controlled trial in the Journal of Experimental Psychology found that students who used self-hypnosis techniques before exams exhibited improved concentration, memory retention, and reduced test anxiety compared to those using mindfulness techniques alone. Key Finding – Hypnosis increased academic performance by 15%, demonstrating its effectiveness as a cognitive enhancer. Scientific Research in Clinical Hypnotherapy – Click here
Overcoming Misinformation and Lobbying
1. Promoting Evidence-Based Hypnotherapy: Professional organizations such as the American Society of Clinical Hypnosis (ASCH) and the British Society of Clinical and Academic Hypnosis (BSCAH) are working to raise awareness about the scientific foundations of hypnotherapy. These organizations offer certification and training programs to ensure practitioners adhere to ethical standards and evidence-based practices.
2. Integrating Hypnotherapy into Healthcare Guidelines: Hypnotherapy is gaining acceptance in certain areas of healthcare, such as pain management and mental health treatment. There is ongoing advocacy for its inclusion in national health guidelines.
3. Educating Healthcare Professionals and the Public: Increasing access to scientific literature and training opportunities helps combat skepticism within the medical community. Educating the public through reliable sources can counter misinformation spread through media.
Case Example: Overcoming Skepticism in the Use of Hypnosis for PTSD: In recent years, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has incorporated hypnosis as a treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among veterans. Initial skepticism was overcome by conducting trials that demonstrated hypnotherapy’s effectiveness in reducing flashbacks, anxiety, and hypervigilance. The Result: Hypnotherapy is now offered as a complementary service, with patient satisfaction ratings exceeding 80%.
4. Increasing Research Funding and Advocacy: Advocating policy changes to include hypnotherapy in clinical guidelines. Advocating for research funding ensures that hypnotherapy studies receive the attention they deserve, building a stronger evidence base.
Collaboration between hypnotherapy organizations and academic institutions can help produce more peer-reviewed studies.
5. Integrating Hypnotherapy into Medical Education: Medical and psychology curricula should include evidence-based hypnotherapy modules to familiarize healthcare professionals with its benefits.
Certification programs can further promote ethical and professional standards in hypnotherapy practice.
6. Counteracting Misinformation and Negative Stereotypes Through Public Awareness: Public education campaigns focusing on scientific evidence and patient success stories can reshape public perception and dispel myths surrounding hypnotherapy.
Providing transparent and accessible information helps patients make informed choices about their healthcare options.
7. Policy Change and Inclusion in Clinical Guidelines: Advocacy efforts should push for the inclusion of hypnotherapy in healthcare protocols, especially for chronic pain, addiction, and mental health conditions.
Encouraging holistic healthcare policies that prioritize non-invasive treatments will reduce the overreliance on pharmaceuticals.
8. Highlighting Advantages of Hypnotherapy Over Drug-Based Treatments
Non-Invasive and Safe: Hypnotherapy avoids the side effects and dependency risks associated with pharmaceuticals.
Long-Term Benefits: Unlike medications that provide temporary relief, hypnotherapy offers lasting behavioral and emotional change.
Cost-Effective: Hypnotherapy reduces healthcare costs by minimizing medication use and preventing relapses.
Patient Empowerment: Through techniques like self-hypnosis, individuals gain tools to manage their mental health independently.
The Path Forward for Hypnotherapy
Despite skepticism, lobbying, and misinformation, scientific research supports hypnotherapy as a legitimate, evidence-based practice. It offers non-invasive, cost-effective solutions to mental health, chronic pain, and behavioral challenges without the risks associated with pharmaceuticals.
Overcoming these challenges requires:
• Ongoing research to strengthen the evidence base.
• Education and advocacy to counter misinformation and integrate hypnotherapy into mainstream healthcare.
• Transparency and professionalism to build trust within the public and medical community.
With growing scientific support and increasing public interest in holistic approaches, hypnotherapy stands at the cusp of greater acceptance, offering a valuable tool in the quest for improved mental and physical well-being.
By addressing the shortcomings of traditional psychiatry—such as over-reliance on medication or limited engagement with the subconscious mind—hypnotherapy offers a holistic, patient-centred approach that can complement or even outperform conventional methods in some cases.
Inner Journeys 